The Longevity Podcast: Optimizing HealthSpan & MindSpan

Train For Your Future Self

Dung Trinh

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 10:51

Send us Fan Mail

We flip health planning by backcasting from the final decade of life and engineering the strength, fitness, and biomarkers needed today. From APOB and Lp(a) to DEXA priorities, strength standards, and hormone clarity, we build a practical roadmap for longer, better years.

• defining the marginal decade and backcasting
• VO2 max decay and fitness as strongest risk modifier
• strength and muscle as metabolic armor
• bloodwork that matters: APOB and Lp(a)
• lipid strategy: diet limits and effective medications
• DEXA focus on bone density, visceral fat, lean mass
• fracture risk and heavy strength interventions
• menopausal therapy reappraised after WHI
• men’s hormones, free testosterone, and fertility
• provocative frontier: rapamycin and ovarian lifespan


This podcast is created by Ai for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute professional medical or health advice. Please talk to your healthcare team for medical advice. 

Never miss an episode—subscribe on your favorite podcast app!

Framing Health As Engineering

SPEAKER_02

Welcome. Thanks for sharing this stack of source material with us. Today's deep dive is really for you, the person who wants to get way ahead of the curve, not just react to things.

SPEAKER_00

That's right.

SPEAKER_02

We're going to try and cut through some of the noise and find the uh objective markers and the philosophy that really drive health span and lifespan.

SPEAKER_00

And it's all about being systematic. The sources really champion this idea of an engineering-based approach. We're looking at everything: exercise, nutrition, hormones, even pharmacology.

SPEAKER_02

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: So the mission today is to figure out how to define your health trajectory right now.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Exactly. To define it against a future that you actually want.

Backcasting And The Marginal Decade

SPEAKER_02

Okay, let's unpack that because we're starting with a concept that sort of flips how you think about long-term health on its head. It's called backcasting.

SPEAKER_00

Right. And it's all about something called the marginal decade.

SPEAKER_02

We all forecast, you know, we plan for next year, maybe five years out. But this is about starting from the end and working backwards.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell It's essential because we have to know what we're aiming for. Longevity isn't just one thing, it has two vectors. Life span, which is, you know, binary, you're live or you're not.

SPEAKER_02

Simple enough.

SPEAKER_00

And then there's health span. That's the quality of that life, your physical abilities, your cognitive function, your emotional well-being.

SPEAKER_02

And the marginal decade is just the last 10 years of your life.

SPEAKER_00

That's it. And the backcasting exercise is to define in like exquisite detail what you want to be able to do during that decade.

SPEAKER_02

So not just be alive, but like specific actions.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Do you want to be able to pick up a great grandchild from the floor, play with them without assistance? Do you want to be able to get up on your own?

SPEAKER_02

I love that because that sets the goal. It's not this vague, I want to be healthy. It's an engineering problem.

SPEAKER_00

It is an engineering problem. You've established the objective function.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah. If you want to run a five-minute mile, you train for that. If you want to be a fully capable 90-year-old, you have to train for that.

SPEAKER_00

And you have to start training now. Because backgasting forces you to quantify what's needed today to fight what the sources call the gravity of aging.

SPEAKER_01

The gravity of aging, I like that. It's this constant pull downwards.

VO2 Max, Decay, And Training Now

SPEAKER_00

It is. Your VO2 max, for example, your body's ability to use oxygen, it declines by about 8 to 10% per decade. Every decade, starting in your 30s.

SPEAKER_02

So wait, if I want to be functional at 90, say I need a VO2 max of 30 just to be independent. What does that mean for me at 50?

SPEAKER_00

Well, you have to do the math backwards.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

You might need to be at, say, 42 or even higher at 50 just to have a buffer for that predictable decay.

SPEAKER_02

So if you're not fit now, you're basically taking out a loan against your future self's mobility.

SPEAKER_00

You are mortgaging your future physical capabilities. That's a perfect way to put it.

Bloodwork Beyond Basics: APOB And Lp(a)

SPEAKER_02

Okay. That makes so much sense. So if we're going to engineer this, we need data. Let's talk metrics. Blood work, how often, and what are we looking for beyond the basics?

SPEAKER_00

Everyone should get a baseline early. I mean, even in your 20s. You need to know if you have any genetic landmines waiting for you.

SPEAKER_02

And after that baseline.

SPEAKER_00

For someone who's already optimizing, maybe two to four times a year, mostly to track an intervention or just confirm you're stable.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

But the standard lipid panel, it's just not enough.

SPEAKER_02

Right. Everyone's fixated on their LDL, their bad cholesterol. Why is that an incomplete picture?

SPEAKER_00

It's incomplete because it measures the mass of the cholesterol, not the number of particles carrying it. The real culprit is the particle number.

SPEAKER_02

Ah, so it's not the weight of the cars, it's the number of cars on the road causing traffic jams in your arteries.

SPEAKER_00

Perfect analogy.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

And the metric that measures that is ACOB or apolepoprotein B. It is the single best predictor of your risk.

SPEAKER_02

APOB. Got it. And there was another one you have to check once.

SPEAKER_00

Yes. LPA, luboprotein, little A. It's the most common genetic driver of atherosclerosis. It affects like 8 to 20% of people. You just check it once to know if you have that risk factor.

SPEAKER_02

And all this ties into the four horsemen of disease, right?

SPEAKER_00

Yes, exactly. Atherosclerotic disease, so heart attacks and strokes cancer, neurodegenerative disease like Alzheimer's, and metabolic disease.

SPEAKER_02

And those four account for what, 80% of death in nonsmokers?

Four Horsemen And Metabolic Priority

DEXA’s Big Three: Bone, Visceral Fat, Muscle

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell About that, yeah. And blood work is our best weapon against the atherosclerotic and metabolic horsemen. And metabolic health fuels the other two, so we start there.

SPEAKER_02

Okay, let's move to functional testing. Blood work can't tell you about your bones or muscles. We need a DEXIS scan.

SPEAKER_00

Right. And most people think DEX is just for body fat percentage. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_02

Which you're saying is the least important metric from that scam.

SPEAKER_00

It is. It's number four on the list. Yeah. The big three are one, bone mineral density or BMD, two, visceral fat. That's the dangerous fat around your organs.

SPEAKER_02

And number three.

SPEAKER_00

Appendicular lean mass index. Basically, how much muscle you have in your arms and legs. It's your strength reserve.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell, let's talk about bone density for a second because the risk there as you age is it's terrifying.

SPEAKER_00

You're catastrophic. If you're over 65 and you break a hip from a simple fall, your one-year mortality rate is between 30 and 40 percent.

SPEAKER_02

30 to 40 percent from a broken bone.

SPEAKER_00

It's the cascade. Yeah, immobility, the complications, that's what gets you.

Bone Density Risks And Strength Training

SPEAKER_02

And our peak bone mass is set by our mid-20s. So what's the intervention now? How do we protect ourselves?

SPEAKER_00

Heavy strength training. Things that put sheer force on the bone, power lifting, heavy farmer carries. You have to stress the bone to make it stronger.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness And Mortality Risk

SPEAKER_02

That morbidity risk is a huge motivator. But let's shift because the data on cardiovascular fitness, it's even more powerful. I mean, the numbers are just staggering.

SPEAKER_00

They really are. To put it in context, we all know smoking is bad. It increases your all-cause mortality risk by what, about 40%?

SPEAKER_02

40%. Okay. That's our baseline for very bad.

SPEAKER_00

Right. Now, VO2 max. If you compare people in the bottom 25% of fitness to those in the top 2.5%, the difference in mortality risk is fivefold.

SPEAKER_02

Wait, fivefold as in 400%.

SPEAKER_00

A 400% difference. The sources are crystal clear. It's the single strongest predictor for any modifiable behavior we know of.

SPEAKER_02

That is just, it's unbelievable. And strength is right up there, too, isn't it?

SPEAKER_00

Absolutely. Low muscle mass versus high muscle mass is associated with a threefold, a 200% greater risk of dying from anything.

SPEAKER_02

So muscle is your metabolic armor.

SPEAKER_00

This is your metabolic sink. It's crucial for insulin signaling, glucose control. And exercise is probably the best thing you can do to prevent Alzheimer's.

SPEAKER_02

This basically proves what you could call a Tia's rule. Until your exercise house is in order, maybe don't waste time debating niche supplements.

SPEAKER_00

I mean, it's about priorities. Nail the big rocks first.

SPEAKER_02

Okay, so let's give people some tangible goals for, say, a 40-year-old.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, some objective metrics. You should be able to do a dead hang for two minutes if you're a man, one and a half for a woman.

SPEAKER_02

Okay.

Objective Fitness Benchmarks At Forty

SPEAKER_00

You should be able to hold a deep air squat, like a wall sit, for two minutes, and a farmer carry with your body weight for men, or 75% for women, for two minutes.

SPEAKER_02

If you can hit those, you're building that reserve capacity for the future.

SPEAKER_00

You're building that buffer against the decline.

SPEAKER_02

Okay. We have to talk about cholesterol. There's so much confusion. Let's start with what we eat.

SPEAKER_00

Right. Let's get some cholesterol clarity. The cholesterol you eat in eggs or whatever has almost no impact on the cholesterol in your blood.

SPEAKER_02

It's not the dietary cholesterol.

SPEAKER_00

No. It's saturated fat that for many people raises those dangerous APOB particles.

SPEAKER_02

So if APOB is the target, what's the goal? I mean, average isn't good enough if average people get heart disease.

SPEAKER_00

That is the key insight. To be essentially immune to heart disease, you'd need to keep your APOB incredibly low. Ideally, below 30 milligdl.

SPEAKER_02

30. The lab reports say under 100 is good.

SPEAKER_00

Right, but under a hundred just means you'll probably get heart disease in your 70s instead of your 50s. 30 is the level you see in newborn babies in populations that don't get heart disease.

SPEAKER_02

And there is no way you can get that low with diet alone.

Pharmacology For Lipids: Tools That Work

SPEAKER_00

For almost everyone, no. Diet won't get you there. This is where pharmacologic intervention often becomes necessary if you're serious about prevention.

SPEAKER_02

So what are the tools?

SPEAKER_00

The main ones are statins, which slow down production in the liver, azetamebe, which blocks reabsorption in the gut, and then the big guns, PCS canine inhibitors, which basically supercharge your liver's ability to clear apopey out of your blood.

Hormone Therapy Revisited: WHI Reframed

SPEAKER_02

That clarifies the lipid landscape a lot. Now hormones. This is another area of massive confusion, largely thanks to one study.

SPEAKER_00

The Women's Health Initiative, or WHI, probably the biggest screw up in modern medical history. It turned an entire generation of doctors and women off of hormone therapy.

SPEAKER_01

And it was flawed, how so?

SPEAKER_00

Deeply flawed. They started women 10 years after menopause. The women were already less healthy, many were smokers, and crucially they use synthetic hormones.

SPEAKER_02

Not the bioidentical ones used today.

SPEAKER_00

Not at all. They use CEE, which is estrogen from horses, and MPA, a synthetic progestin. And that MPA is likely what caused the slight negative signals.

SPEAKER_02

And the headlines about breast cancer risk were terrifying.

SPEAKER_00

They were, but they were about relative risk. The absolute risk increase was tiny, like one extra case per thousand women per year. The benefits for bone health and quality of life were huge.

SPEAKER_02

So the lesson isn't HRT is bad, it's the right molecule at the right time is critical.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Start it as you enter menopause, not decade later, and use bioidentical hormones. It's a totally different risk-benefit conversation.

SPEAKER_02

Okay, let's shift to men in TRT. The focus is always on total testosterone.

SPEAKER_00

Which is almost meaningless on its own. The number you have to focus on is free testosterone or free T. That's the portion that's biologically active.

SPEAKER_02

And the goal is to get that into the upper end of the normal range.

SPEAKER_00

The upper end of the physiologic normal range? Yes. Usually with a low dose approach, like 100 milligrams a week, split into two shots, to mimic the body's natural rhythm.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell What about men who want to preserve their fertility?

SPEAKER_00

That's a huge consideration. Exogenous testosterone shuts down your own production. So for those men, you'd use something like HCG, which stimulates the testes directly to produce their own testosterone, keeping everything online.

SPEAKER_02

We've covered a ton of ground here. From uh backcasting your 90-year-old self to measuring APOB, clarifying the WHI study, and hitting those really tough strength metrics.

SPEAKER_00

It really provides an objective, actionable roadmap you can use to influence your own health span.

Roadmap Recap And Future Frontiers

SPEAKER_02

Absolutely. We've laid out the tools based on what's proven, but the frontiers are always moving, which leads to a really provocative final thought for you to consider.

SPEAKER_00

Right. So there is compelling animal data that a molecule called rapamycin can preserve and even extend ovarian life dramatically. So the question is what might the future of female fertility look like if that research translates to humans?

Closing: Measure, Train, Learn

SPEAKER_02

Just think about the implications of that. Keep measuring, keep training, and above all, keep learning. Thank you for joining us for this deep dive.